AI workflows and automation
Connect tasks, documents, data and repetitive processes so they run on without someone pressing buttons.
We don't sell the word "AI" — we use AI to build things that solve problems: cutting repetitive work, connecting documents and data, and systems that adapt to each user, the same way AIVEQ and TUXA use AI to read every answer a learner gives.

Good AI understands the data, the process and the context of the work. So we start from what your team repeats every week, then decide where AI does well and where people still need to decide.
Connect tasks, documents, data and repetitive processes so they run on without someone pressing buttons.
Let your team ask questions and find answers across internal documents, manuals and know-how in plain language.
Systems that read users' behaviour and results and adjust what they recommend — the way AIVEQ adjusts questions to each learner.
Add AI to your web app, mobile app and business systems through APIs without rebuilding everything.
Before building AI systems for anyone else, we use AI in our own live products and see how it behaves with real data.
AIVEQ analyses each learner's accuracy, answer patterns and progress, then adjusts question difficulty and suggests the foundations to revisit when they get stuck.
See the product
TUXA reads answer patterns, reasoning, accuracy and time to find where points are lost, then plans the next task where it matters most for the exam.
See the productEvery company can say "AI". These questions separate teams that make AI work in practice from teams that only sell the word — ask us too.
A good-looking demo is easy. Making AI work correctly with real users every day is much harder.
A verbal promise is not enough. This belongs in the contract with every AI provider.
At AI.ac.thStudent data is not used to train external providers' models — a requirement in every contract with the AI services we use — and we share a draft data processing agreement in advance.
Teams that propose AI for everything tend to raise costs and produce results nobody can check.
At AI.ac.thIn the Discovery Sprint we say plainly which tasks are worth AI and which are not.
Every AI can be wrong. Work that affects people or the business needs a person to check it first.
At AI.ac.thWe build accuracy checks into the process and keep people as the decision-makers for important work. AI assists; it does not decide.
You should know whose hands your data passes through before the work starts, not after a problem.
At AI.ac.thWe disclose every external data processor — hosting and model providers — along with the countries their servers are in.
AI projects that start by rebuilding everything take a long time before you see any result.
At AI.ac.thNo. We connect AI to the systems you already use through APIs and only build new what the old systems cannot do.
AI systems work with your organisation's data, and many of our systems handle data about minors. So we have written the answers down in advance for your leadership and legal team to review before we even meet.
Every step has a clear deliverable, and we test with real users before rolling out to the whole organisation.
We talk to the people who will actually use the system, not just the people commissioning it, map the current process end to end, and separate the real problem from its symptoms.
We design the data structure, access rights and key screens, starting from the tasks users do most often — not the prettiest screen.
We ship in rounds you can try before it is finished, because what users say when they see the real thing is always different from what they say about a picture.
Launch day is not the end. We follow real usage in the first weeks, fix what gets in the way, and decide what to build next from what the data shows.
Step one tells you which tasks are worth AI — and which are not.
Not ready to commit to the whole project? Start with step one alone. At the end you will know what to build, what it should cost and how long it will take.
Talk about a Discovery SprintWhat businesses and organisations ask before starting an AI project
Choose a team that runs AI with real users in its own products, puts data terms in the contract, can tell you which tasks should not use AI, keeps people in charge of important decisions, discloses its model providers and doesn't make you rip out your existing systems. See the six questions before you hire an AI company.
It depends on the work. AI does well on repetitive work, large volumes of documents or data, and tasks whose results can be checked. Work that needs a lot of judgement still needs people to decide. A 2-week Discovery Sprint shows which tasks are worth using AI for — and which are not.
For systems that handle student data, the data is not used to train external providers' models — a requirement we set in every contract with the AI services we connect to. We disclose every model and hosting provider along with where their servers are, and we have a draft data processing agreement your legal team can read before any commercial discussion.
No. We connect AI to your web app, mobile app or existing systems through APIs and build new only what the old systems cannot do.
Yes — every AI system can be wrong. We build ways to check accuracy into the process and keep people as the decision-makers for work that matters. AI is an assistant, not the decision-maker.
We choose based on the task, the accuracy it needs, cost and the data requirements of each project, and we disclose every provider to you before work starts.
Yes — a good system should work without understanding AI. If you want your team to use AI more in their daily work, AI Academy runs a "Put AI to work" course for teachers, staff and employees; everyone leaves with at least one working workflow.
It depends on scope and the systems it must connect to. Start with a 2-week Discovery Sprint to get a prototype, a budget estimate and a timeline you can rely on before committing to the whole project.
Tell us where your team loses the most time and we will help you see how much AI can really do.